<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Discrimination against Otaku</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ejovi.net/2007/05/07/discrimination-against-otaku/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ejovi.net/2007/05/07/discrimination-against-otaku/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 04:28:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris_B</title>
		<link>http://www.ejovi.net/2007/05/07/discrimination-against-otaku/#comment-78784</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris_B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2007 05:51:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ejovi.net/2007/05/07/discrimination-against-otaku/#comment-78784</guid>
		<description>Its true that the englishized word "otaku" (as popularized by an early issue of Wired magazine) and the original ã‚ªã‚¿ã‚¯ are very different, (much like "ãƒœãƒŠã‚¹" and "bonus" but thats another story).

In general I've noticed that there is a kind of cultural prejudice here against anyone who is "too interested" in something to the point where they are called ãƒžãƒ‹ã‚¢ã‚¯. I've learned to keep my personal interests private from people who I dont know very well since I tend to get very interested in things to the point of knowing a fair amount of history, etc about whatever it is.

What I want to know is what makes someone referred to as ã‚ªã‚¿ã‚¯ instead of å…ˆç”Ÿ since the latter is a respectful way to refer to someone who is very knowledgeable besides just meaning "teacher" or "doctor". Could it be just a matter of how the person deals with other people? ã‚ªã‚¿ã‚¯ are known for their poor human relations skills or the complete lack of wanting to deal with other humans. Since äººé–“é–¢ä¿‚ is so generally important here, perhaps thats the deciding factor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its true that the englishized word &#8220;otaku&#8221; (as popularized by an early issue of Wired magazine) and the original ã‚ªã‚¿ã‚¯ are very different, (much like &#8220;ãƒœãƒŠã‚¹&#8221; and &#8220;bonus&#8221; but thats another story).</p>
<p>In general I&#8217;ve noticed that there is a kind of cultural prejudice here against anyone who is &#8220;too interested&#8221; in something to the point where they are called ãƒžãƒ‹ã‚¢ã‚¯. I&#8217;ve learned to keep my personal interests private from people who I dont know very well since I tend to get very interested in things to the point of knowing a fair amount of history, etc about whatever it is.</p>
<p>What I want to know is what makes someone referred to as ã‚ªã‚¿ã‚¯ instead of å…ˆç”Ÿ since the latter is a respectful way to refer to someone who is very knowledgeable besides just meaning &#8220;teacher&#8221; or &#8220;doctor&#8221;. Could it be just a matter of how the person deals with other people? ã‚ªã‚¿ã‚¯ are known for their poor human relations skills or the complete lack of wanting to deal with other humans. Since äººé–“é–¢ä¿‚ is so generally important here, perhaps thats the deciding factor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ryoko</title>
		<link>http://www.ejovi.net/2007/05/07/discrimination-against-otaku/#comment-77789</link>
		<dc:creator>ryoko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 15:57:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ejovi.net/2007/05/07/discrimination-against-otaku/#comment-77789</guid>
		<description>I didn't know anything about Otaku. I didn't know there were such a discrimination even though I've been lived in Tokyo more than five years.  I think Wakasa represents a typical Japnese very well, and Murakami seems to be very honest person to me.  I don't know if his opinion is right though.    Anyway, it's very intresting article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t know anything about Otaku. I didn&#8217;t know there were such a discrimination even though I&#8217;ve been lived in Tokyo more than five years.  I think Wakasa represents a typical Japnese very well, and Murakami seems to be very honest person to me.  I don&#8217;t know if his opinion is right though.    Anyway, it&#8217;s very intresting article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
