Comments on: Isn’t this how Creative Commons works? http://www.ejovi.net/2007/02/10/isnt-this-how-creative-commons-works/ Fri, 25 Jul 2008 15:36:54 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6 By: Chris_B http://www.ejovi.net/2007/02/10/isnt-this-how-creative-commons-works/#comment-44649 Chris_B Wed, 14 Feb 2007 10:03:15 +0000 http://www.ejovi.net/2007/02/10/isnt-this-how-creative-commons-works/#comment-44649 Too bad most licenses dont require exams for that matter. Too bad most licenses dont require exams for that matter.

]]> By: ejovi nuwere http://www.ejovi.net/2007/02/10/isnt-this-how-creative-commons-works/#comment-43944 ejovi nuwere Sun, 11 Feb 2007 04:28:03 +0000 http://www.ejovi.net/2007/02/10/isnt-this-how-creative-commons-works/#comment-43944 "anyway CC is a “license”, you need to be careful. DMV won’t give you drivers license without exams…." LOL! :-) “anyway CC is a “license”, you need to be careful. DMV won’t give you drivers license without exams….” LOL! :-)

]]> By: gt http://www.ejovi.net/2007/02/10/isnt-this-how-creative-commons-works/#comment-43939 gt Sun, 11 Feb 2007 03:32:44 +0000 http://www.ejovi.net/2007/02/10/isnt-this-how-creative-commons-works/#comment-43939 you're right. this is strange one... obviously Seth wasn't careful when he chose CC license　"Attribution" (or, credit only) for his work. my guess is that he thought　"Attribution" license enforces others to distribute his work with "no charge". probably he confused "Attribution" license as "Copy Left", but they were not the same. as he admits in recent blog post, it was his misunderstanding of the license and he probably didn't recognize it when he chose the licese. CC licenses can be selected with a few clicks so some people may not be careful enough when they select the licenses. Cory knowingly carefully used CC license for his work. but Seth seem didn't. now he complains to the publisher that followed the CC license terms of "Attribution" and brings up "Trade Mark Law" which isn't supposed to be in the scope of Creative Commons...?? to me, it looks kinda too late sort-of-ish action, unless he 'trade marked' himself and his works. anyway CC is a "license", you need to be careful. DMV won't give you drivers license without exams.... you’re right. this is strange one… obviously Seth wasn’t careful when he chose CC license　”Attribution” (or, credit only) for his work.

my guess is that he thought　”Attribution” license enforces others to distribute his work with “no charge”. probably he confused “Attribution” license as “Copy Left”, but they were not the same. as he admits in recent blog post, it was his misunderstanding of the license and he probably didn’t recognize it when he chose the licese.

CC licenses can be selected with a few clicks so some people may not be careful enough when they select the licenses. Cory knowingly carefully used CC license for his work. but Seth seem didn’t. now he complains to the publisher that followed the CC license terms of “Attribution” and brings up “Trade Mark Law” which isn’t supposed to be in the scope of Creative Commons…?? to me, it looks kinda too late sort-of-ish action, unless he ‘trade marked’ himself and his works.

anyway CC is a “license”, you need to be careful. DMV won’t give you drivers license without exams….

]]> By: Chris_B http://www.ejovi.net/2007/02/10/isnt-this-how-creative-commons-works/#comment-43932 Chris_B Sun, 11 Feb 2007 03:18:38 +0000 http://www.ejovi.net/2007/02/10/isnt-this-how-creative-commons-works/#comment-43932 Bingo! Bingo!

]]>